|
'Tribal'
acts giving a false view of Muslims
Slaughter in Algeria, the plight of two
nurses in Saudi Arabia, and the Taliban's arrest of Emma Bonino give the world a
false view of Islam, argues Michael Jansen.
Irish Times, Wednesday,
October 1, 1997
The detention on Monday of European Humanitarian Affairs Commissioner Emma
Bonino by Taliban morals police in Afghanistan, the sentencing of two British
nurses accused of murder to corporal punishments in Saudi Arabia, and the
slaughter of 11 schoolmistresses in Algeria send the wrong messages about Islam
to the world.
These three examples show Muslims - and by implication their religion - to be
intolerant, harsh and bloodthirsty. Unfortunately, these actions speak louder
than the words of God set down in the Koran 14 centuries ago, louder than the
just pronouncements of the Prophet Muhammad, louder than the voices of learned
jurists who, over the centuries, developed a body of law and practice (the
"Sharia") far more enlightened for their time than that in Europe.
These examples are not of mainstream Muslim behaviour, expressive of the writ
and spirit of Islam or indicative of the teachings of the Prophet. These are
examples drawn from the behaviour patterns of tribesmen come to town. Behaviour patterns, indeed, which are pre-Islamic and have little to do with the
code of conduct laid down in the Koran and the "traditions" or
"hadith" of the Prophet.
Let us look at each case in point. The Taliban is a movement of militant
Sunni Muslim Afghan tribesmen from the south of the country. Rural people who
live hard lives and employ harsh sanctions to ensure a modicum of order within
their closely circumscribed world. In their society women have no rights at all
- they are completely covered and totally secluded. Girls are sold off by their
fathers for the right bride price when they are young, and often resold by
husbands who tire of them. Unused to the amenities of urban civilisation, the
Taliban ban them. There is, for instance, no music in Afghanistan except for
unaccompanied religious songs and songs in praise of the Taliban.
Photography is forbidden as anti-Islamic because of the prohibition of
"graven images" which could serve as objects of worship. It was
photographing women in a shambles of a hospital in Kabul (the only hospital for
women in the capital) which sparked the trouble between the Taliban and the
European delegation. As far as the unkempt, unwashed and ignorant Taliban morals
police who intervened, the Europeans were breaching two bans.
But the Taliban treatment of women and their attitude towards civilisation
have nothing to do with the Koran or the practice of the Prophet. The Koran
commands women to "be modest" and "to draw their veils over their
bosoms" (Surah XXIV, verse 31) not to envelop themselves in the sort of
chador worn by Afghan women which leaves only a square of net open for the eyes.
The Prophet was an innovator who gave women legal status, property and
inheritance rights. He was a man whose closest confidantes were women, whose
first convert was his wife, Khadija, an independent businesswoman. The
"canonical punishments" of beheading and flogging as practised in
Saudi Arabia are also tribal, relics of the pre-Islamic past when nomadic
tribesmen maintained order by lopping off the hands of thieves and the heads of
murderers. Blood money was an innovation intended to prevent blood feuds. Like
the Taliban, the Saudi rulers are tribal, even after 70 years in power, hailing
from the Najd region in the formerly inaccessible centre of the country and
professing a puritan form of Islam based on the teachings of Muhammad bin Abdul
Wahhab, an 18th century fundamentalist preacher who invested the House of Saud
with hereditary kingship.
And since the power base and religious sanction of the monarchy remains the
tribal Najd and the reactionary Wahhabi religious establishment, the monarch
follows a harsh desert diktat which runs counter to the Muslim belief in a
"merciful" and "compassionate" God, a belief reaffirmed in
every prayer.
Saudi law and practice has not been refined to suit an urban setting or a
cosmopolitan context. This is why pre-Islamic corporal punishments are imposed
on all who dwell within the kingdom, Muslim and non-Muslim alike. But it is only
when the punishments are applied to Western women like Deborah Parry and Lucille
McLauchlan that the world takes notice. The brutal massacres conducted by the
Armed Islamic Groups in Algeria are not only an aberration but an abomination in
Islam. The Koran lays down humane rules of war while the Prophet ordered his own
troops, when fighting for the faith, to "kill not the old men who cannot
fight, nor young children nor women".
The roving bands of Algerian murderers who claim to kill in the name of Islam
and God, are apostates, rejecting both the Koran and the teachings of the
Prophet. They are men led astray by commanders and clerics who are veterans of
the particularly bloody and brutal war against the Soviets in Afghanistan. This
war was financed by Saudi Arabia at the instigation of the United States, and
the "mujahedin", the "holy warriors", fighting in the
anti-communist crusade were given religious instruction by preachers provided by
the Saudis.
Foreign "mujahedin", known as "Afghans", were recruited
from all over the Arab world, trained in Pakistan, sent into battle and then
discarded once the Russians pulled out of Afghanistan. Many who returned home
became involved in Islamist opposition activities and have been either killed or
arrested by their own governments. Others turned up in Bosnia or the Palestinian
occupied territories, eager recruits for warfare against "enemies of
Islam" like the Serbs and Israelis.
Like the "Afghans", the Taliban are Pakistan-trained and Saudi
indoctrinated and financed, so it is not surprising that there are many
similarities between Taliban and Saudi rule, and not simply on the tribal level.
It is a tragedy for Islam that the tribalist Wahhabi agenda, backed up by
Arabian petro-dollars, should be a major force in the Umma at this time of world
transformation. For the Wahhabis have reacted to the challenge of modernisation
by trying to force the Umma into an idealised seventh century
"Islamic" mould instead of creating a determination to take on the
present and provide a relevant, progressive Islamic framework for Muslims.
|